Was the NEET paper set fairly?IIT or a top private universityOpinion on the first foldable iPhoneCoaching centre or self-studyIs a CS degree still worth four years?Remote, hybrid or officeHow good was the placement season?AI assistants: help or crutch?Should boards be held twice a year?Theatre or streamingWas the NEET paper set fairly?
Feelings and choices are different↓→OpinionHQ keeps them separate
Topics
How does India feel?
Rate one subject: positive, neutral or negative.
Your opinion on The Odyssey70% Positive◇Preview — not live data
Positive70%
Neutral20%
Negative10%
An illustration of the shape. Every figure on a real topic page is counted from votes.
✓Track sentiment over time
✓See what drives the rating
✓Read opinions and replies
Polls
No neutral. Pick one.
Two to four choices. One clear split.
iPhone vs Android53% Android◇Preview — not live data
47%53%
iPhoneAndroid
An illustration of the shape. A real poll states its own margin and breaks down by region, age, occupation and gender.
✓See every option at a glance
✓Compare different groups
✓Read why each side chose it
Beyond the number
The number is only the start.
Filter by state, age or occupation. Watch the result move.
One number never tells the whole story↓→Filter it. Compare it. Question it.
Preview — not live data
Opinion topic · Entertainment
The Odyssey
Three weeks in. Was it the film everyone spent a year waiting for?
ReadingEveryone— choose a group to update the result
01
The reading, and how it got there
The distribution, and the three weeks that produced it — with what happened plotted on the line.
Sentiment distribution
70%Positivedominant view
Cast a sentiment vote
One vote per account, changeable until the subject closes. Reading needs no account.
How it moved21 days · 2 events plotted
100500
Day 1● Positive● NegativeDay 21
Daily participation
Day 3Opening weekend endsevent
Day 14Streaming date announcedevent
02
Who took part, and where the split flips
Every bar is a group and every stack is how that group answered — click one and every panel re-reads as them.
Bar length is how much of the sample a group is. The stack inside it is how that group split. The figure on the right is how far that group sits from the reading above, in points, on whichever answer is currently leading — click any row to re-read every panel as that group.
State± on Positive
Age band± on Positive
Occupation± on Positive
GenderParticipation only — this illustration asserts no split by gender
Woman44.1%Man53.2%Self-described2.7%
Against the grain
41+ is the one age band that goes another way — 47% negative, against the rest of the sample.
On a live subject, location, age and occupation are optional and self-declared, and a segment too small to publish without identifying the people in it is withheld rather than shown.
03
The parts people actually argue about
A subject is not one question. Each part of it is asked separately, so a film can be liked and its ending disliked.
A film is not asked to be rated out of five. It is asked the questions films get argued about — the same set every Entertainment topic carries. One click each, no submit button, and the headline vote stays a separate question.
Story & screenplay
How was the writing?
46% said Gripping
Performances
How did the cast do?
74% said Outstanding
Cinematography & VFX
How did it look?
88% said Stunning
Worth the ticket
Would you tell a friend to watch it in a theatre?
61% said Yes, go
04
What people wrote
The written half, kept in the same list as the numbers and carrying the position its author voted.
Your contributionvotedPositive
Post anonymouslyAttach a link or imageLong-form formatPost
The written half is optional — a vote counts on its own. What you write appears in the list below, carries the position you voted, and can be posted under your name or anonymously.
▲ParticipantPositive
Sat in the front row by accident and would do it again
The scale is not a gimmick here — it is the whole argument the film is making. Nothing on a laptop is going to survive the trip.
▼ParticipantNegativeScale is doing a lot of heavy lifting for a middle hour that forgets it has characters in it.reply·like
●ParticipantNeutralBoth true. Spectacular to sit inside, thin to think about afterwards.reply·like
▼ParticipantNegative
Beautiful, loud, and about forty minutes too pleased with itself
Half the dialogue is buried under the score and the other half is exposition. I could not tell you what anyone wanted by the end.
●ParticipantNeutralStructured
What the adaptation gains, and what the poem still does better
Where it is strongest
The voyage sequences are the best case anyone has made in years for shooting practically and projecting big.
Where it thins out
The homecoming is the half of the story that carries the meaning, and it is the half given the least room.
Worth the ticket
Yes, on the largest screen you can reach. The argument for a second viewing is weaker than the argument for the first.
Example text. On a live topic, contributions carry their author, can be posted anonymously, and are kept separate from editor-published updates — which are sourced and sit in their own tab.
A worked example, not a measurement. No headcount appears anywhere in it and nobody was asked — the model behind it exists so the panels agree with each other while you filter. Every figure on a live subject page is counted from votes.
A number without context means little↓→See how the result changes across groups
01
Editors publish a subject
A topic or a poll, with a plain description and sourced context. Nothing is measured until somebody has written down what is actually being asked.
02
You answer in one click
A sentiment vote and its aspect questions, or a side in a head-to-head. Reading needs no account; voting needs one, because one vote counts per person.
03
Answers become a distribution
Every vote rolls into one continuous measurement instead of a thousand scattered comments — with the sample size stated next to it, always.
04
The result stays readable
Verified events plotted on the trend, cross-tabs by region and age, and written reasons kept separate from sourced fact.
What we measure
Thirteen kinds of argument.
Each type asks its own questions. A college is judged on placements and hostels; an exam on whether it was run cleanly; a politician on delivery rather than party. Nothing gets a generic five-star rating.
Opinion on most subjects is scattered across a dozen places↓→One measured page per subject, open to read without an account